|
|
||||
|
Opinion: June / July 2002 Peter Haining once edited a book called Detours Into the Macabre, collecting Horror stories by major writers from other fields (William Faulkner, Somerset Maugham, Raymond Chandler, even Winston Churchill). It is a commonplace that all important writers, from DH Lawrence (The Rocking Horse Winner) to Fay Weldon (Puffball), come up with a least one ghost or Horror story. Less noted is that the same holds true for the cinema: most A-list pantheon directors manage at least one genre movie. Witness: Bergman (Hour of the Wolf), Fellini (Toby Dammit), Murnau (Nosferatu), Dreyer (Vampyr), Hitchcock (Psycho), Powell (Peeping Tom), Truffaut (The Green Room) and Kubrick (The Shining). Hawks puppeteered Christian Nyby through The Thing From Another World, Kurosawa and Welles both played Macbeth for weird horror and Buñuel's macabre streak included a crawling hand in An Exterminating Angel. There are even weird credits for Richard Attenborough (Magic) and James Ivory (Savages). Many of these balance the low esteem of being Horror movies with the cultural plus factor of being literary adaptations. For his 'detour into the macabre', Jean Renoir, frequently nominated as one of the top three or four film directors of all time, selected Robert Louis Stevenson's Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. TV techniques Street crime Renoir's chief interest in the project was the opportunity to work with the major stage star Barrault, best known in films for Les Enfants du Paradis. The role of Jekyll-and-Hyde is a challenge that tempts star actors into Horror; Barrault, while staying remarkably close to Stevenson's conception, delivers one of the most surprising, singular and creepy readings of the part(s). Tom Milne, in The Aurum Film Encyclopedia, notes the kinship between Opale and Michel Simon's 'nihilist tramp' in Renoir's 1936 classic Boudu Sauvé des Eaux, but the modern viewer is more likely to make a connection with an earlier hobo, the screen character created by Charlie Chaplin, and Testament works as a deconstruction of the public and private Chaplin personae. The dignified, dapper, white-haired Dr Cordelier is the image of the offscreen Chaplin of later years (down to the squeaky voice), while the sexualization of his motivation (in one of the few scenes invented for the film, a younger Cordelier resists a seductive patient even though he writhes with obvious desire) recalls the comedian's well-known womanising. Silent speed Chaplin's own escape was Monsieur Verdoux, a dapper French mass murderer who could well be a younger Cordelier or an older Opale. Chaplin offers sentiment tinged with sadism: the little fellow kicking the huge cop in the bum is, after all, also the bigshot director with complete power over the booted bit-player. Some scandal-seekers (cuing Malcolm McDowell's murderous Chaplin-á-clef in Blake Edwards' Sunset) have gone so far as to suggest that Charlie was personally overfond of taking his fists to defenceless bystanders. The scene in which Opale tramples the child (always the most shocking Hyde transgression) is a bizarre, cruel reminder of Chaplin's penchant for underage love matches. Renoir, the great humanitarian director, and Barrault, the great mime, must have had ambiguous feelings about Chaplin (Charlot is practically a sainted figure in France), and this combination of tribute and character assassination manages to work through their feelings about the Little Tramp and his unhappy creator. Entertaining and charming as Opale is, especially compared to the stuffy supporting cast, he is also a monster. Minor Renoir First Published In: Shivers no.97 (June / July 2002) pp.38-39 (UK) Visit Kim's Official Website at www.johnnyalucard.com
|
||||
|
All text on this page © 2000 - 2006 EOFFTV |